Vines v. Lee

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

The defendant in error in her petition alleged that the legal title to the realty involved was in her husband, who had conveyed it to the plaintiffs in error pending her suit against the husband for divorce and alimony, in which suit she had scheduled this identical property. She further alleged that she was in possession, and asked that plaintiffs in error be enjoined from interfering with her occupancy, and that a decree be entered subjecting the property to her claim for alimony. It has been ruled, in effect, that one who before the rendition of the verdict in…