Legal Opinion

New York State Natural Gas Corp. v. Roeder

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 6, 1956No. Appeal, No. 214PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Arnold,

This action was begun by a bill in equity in which the plaintiff sought to restrain the defendants, inter alia, from drilling a gas well on the property leased to plaintiff, alleging that the defendants were mere intruders, had no rights to the gas in question, and were engaged in a continuing trespass.

After taking testimony at length on plaintiff’s application for a preliminary injunction, the chancellor, the late Judge Hipple, made elaborate findings of fact and. conclusions of law and granted the preliminary injunction. Thereafter, on final hearing, by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Douglass v. Queeney, Jr. Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Rozelle v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. Cox v. CouchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1848

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Baker v. Roslyn Swim ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Pato v. CernuskaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Philadelphia Fresh Food Terminal Corp. v. M. Levin & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Will v. PIPERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Pennsylvania Electric Co. v. WaltmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API