Legal Opinion

Allen v. Waddle

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 8, 1922No. 23,831PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Franklin district court; Hugh Means, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*691The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

In an action upon a negotiable note and real-estate mortgage securing it, the trial court held that the defendant (the mortgagor) was entitled to credit for payments made to and retained by the mortgagees after the note and mortgage had been assigned, because of the assignment not having been recorded. The plaintiff (the assignee) appeals from this ruling.

1. The defendant invokes the statute reading:

“In cases where assignments of real-estate mortgages are made after the passage of this act, if such assignments are not recorded, the mortgagor,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burhans v. HutchesonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. Middlekauff v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  3. Anthony v. BrennanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Fitzgerald v. Grain Belt Realty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  5. Goodyear v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. White v. KemberlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Pletcher v. AlbrechtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. Interstate National Bank v. KosterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. Jacobs v. HesterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API