Legal Opinion
Stastny v. Sedivec (Sedivec)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided October 22, 2008No. 19-00326PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: COMPLAINT TO DETERMINE DISCHARGEABILITY
PAUL J. KILBURG, Chief Judge.
Trial was held on September 4, 2008 on Plaintiffs Complaint to determine dis-chargeability. Plaintiff Diane Stastny and Defendant John Sedivec appeared pro se. In order to aid in identifying the parties, the Court will refer to them as Diane and John. After trial, the Court took the matter under advisement. This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)®.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Diane asserts that the debt owed to her by John should be excepted from discharge for fraud or false pretenses. John denies that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- In Re Jesse H. Long, Debtor. Barclays American/business Credit, Inc. v. Jesse H. LongCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- In the Matter of Michael VAN HORNE. Margaret CASPERS, Appellee, v. Michael VAN HORNE, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Guske v. Guske (In Re Guske)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Winston-Salem City Employees' Federal Credit Union v. Casper (In Re Casper)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2012
- Barvié v. Broadus (In re Broadus)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2014