Legal Opinion

People v. Houston

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1937No. Crim. 350PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

Defendant was charged with violation of the provisions of section 480 of the Vehicle Code, which denounces the crime popularly known as “hit and run”. He was convicted and sentenced to confinement in the penitentiary. He made motions for arrest of judgment and for new trial, which were denied. He has appealed from these orders and from the judgment. He has also attempted to appeal from a multitude of rulings and orders of the trial judge, none of which is appealable. (See. 1237, Pen. Code.) The order denying a motion for arrest of judgment is not appeal-able. (People v. Williams, 184 Cal. 590…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. VoiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. People v. WhitsettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. People v. HoustonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API