Legal Opinion
Driggs v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 1, 1902PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Action by Edmund F. Driggs against the city of New York.
1Per curiam
There being no appeal by the defendant, the question whether or not, under section 308 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the limit of $500 is intended to in-*1013elude all allowances for incidental expenses, etc., is not before the court. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
2Cited by1 opinion
- In re MonfortAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903