Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 21, 2009PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*670In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Kathleen Smith and Steven Leventhal separately appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (McCarty III, J.), dated August 7, 2008, which granted the plaintiffs motion for leave to renew and reargue her opposition to their separate motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), which had been granted in an order dated May 6, 2008, and upon renewal…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Sainte-Aime v. HoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Tagliaferri v. WeilerNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Nociforo v. PennaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Abrams v. BerelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Choy v. Mai Ling LaiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. DeMarquez v. GalloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. V. Veeraswamy Realty v. Yenom Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Carter v. CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API