Legal Opinion

Tyson v. Nazarian

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 2012PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, by denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment and remitting to the Appellate Division for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum, and, as so modified, affirmed.

Sufficient record evidence exists to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether plaintiff suffered a “serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 957 [1992]). In view of its disposition, the Appellate Division did not address plaintiff’s contention that she is entitled to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. LINNANE, KAREN M. v. SZABO, LAJOSAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API