Legal Opinion

HIXSON AUTOPLEX OF ALEXANDRIA, INC. v. Lewis

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 2009No. 08-1142PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMY, Judge.

liAn employer and employee entered into a non-competition agreement. The employee was terminated and began to work for a competing company. The employer sought to enforce the non-competition agreement. The trial court, finding one provision invalid on the grounds of it being contrary to public policy, severed the offending provision and enforced the remaining two provisions of the agreement. The employer appeals, contending that the trial court erred by retroactively applying a substantive change to the pertinent statute. For the following reasons, we affirm in part and reverse in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cole v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  2. Kem Search, Inc. v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  4. Herff Jones, Inc. v. GirouardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Hooper v. HooperLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cole v. Sabine Bancshares, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Cynthia Anne Cole v. Sabine Bancshares, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. HIXSON AUTOPLEX OF ALEXANDRIA, INC. v. LewisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Setpoint Integrated Solutions, Inc v. William KiteleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API