Legal Opinion

Hallmark v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1940No. 6 Div. 621PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Judge.

This is the second appeal from a judgment of conviction for the offense of vagrancy. Opinion in the first appeal is reported in 28 Ala.App. 416, 185 So. 908. Trial of the instant case, in the lower court, again proceeded for a violation of Subd. 6 of Section 5571, Code 1923 — specifically that defendant (appellant) was a professional gambler during the period jfrom August 6, 1936, to August 6, 1937.

It was the contention of the State upon trial that the defendant, during the specified period, was concerned, engaged or interested in an illegal lottery, described by witnesses as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wallace v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Angelo D'Alessandro v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  3. Hallmark v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. Stephenson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arnold v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Flandell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Hallmark v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API