Legal Opinion
Gagliardo v. Dinkins
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 22, 1996PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Levine, J.
These cases involve challenges to the statutory scheme that created variable supplements funds (VSFs) to provide additional financial benefits to certain retirees of the New York City Housing Police and the New York City Transit Police, based on attainment of a statutorily defined period of service. 1 Plaintiffs in Gagliardo v Dinkins are retired New York City Housing Police Officers or Housing Police Superior Officers who receive New York City Employees’ Retirement System (NYCERS) pension benefits but are statutorily ineligible for Housing Police VSF benefits.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Traynor v. TurnageSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 3 of Huntington v. Associated Teachers of Huntington, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Sgaglione v. LevittNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Antonopoulou v. BeameNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Ballentine v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Castellano v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Ballentine v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- DeLuca v. DeLucaNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Castellano v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- McGinty v. State of NYDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.