Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Fleming

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1923No. Docket No. 146Published

1DissentFellows, J.

I do not agree with my Brother Bird that it was competent for the people to prove that defendant had on other occasions committed the crime of larceny from other stores in the daytime, or that this case falls within the exception to the general rule that a defendant in a criminal case may only be called upon to meet the crime charged in the information. I think the question has been settled in this State for over half a century that a charge of larceny is within the rule and not within the exception. While there are exceptions to the rule which will be presently noted, larceny is not one of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. People v. SeamanMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Lightfoot v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  3. People v. WakelyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. People v. HensslerMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  5. People v. SchweitzerMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API