Legal Opinion

People v. Orr

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1967No. 40501PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Underwood

In this case as in In re Urbasek, No. 40411, decided this term, a juvenile adjudged delinquent seeks to raise substantial questions as to the effect of the decision of the United States Supreme Court in In re Application of Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 18 L. Ed. 2d 527, 87 S. Ct. 1428, upon proceedings under the Illinois Juvenile Court Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1965, chap. 37, pars. 701 — 1 through 708 — 4) involving minors alleged to be delinquent. While respondent contends the Miranda rules relating to confessions and the constitutional and statutory provisions regarding bail in criminal cases are now…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Ohio v. HymoreOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  5. La Salle National Bank v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. The People v. HillIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. LaffertySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  3. People v. RueggerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  4. Bedingfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  5. People v. McKinleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1977

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API