United States of America, and Cross-Appellant v. Jerry Santiago, and Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CARRIGAN, District Judge.
Defendant Jerry Santiago appeals his conviction and sentence for one count of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341. He argues that the prosecutor’s comments during closing argument were so prejudicial as to require a new trial. He further asserts that his exclusion from the district judge’s ex parte examination of a juror violated his right to be present at all stages of the trial. In addition, both parties appeal aspects of the district court’s sentencing decisions.
I. BACKGROUND.
In 1989, Santiago was a United States Customs Service enforcement officer in New…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Rushen v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Routier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Bland v. SirmonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Lupe GomezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Marcus CanadyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Robert Coffman, Jerry Beller, and Thresher T. RippeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.