Legal Opinion

Stern v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided December 17, 1926No. Docket No. 19376Published

1Opinion of the Court

LOUIS STERN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Stern v. Commissioner

Docket No. 19376.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

5 B.T.A. 870; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2760;

December 17, 1926, Promulgated

Louis Stern pro se.

W. F. Gibbs, Esq. for the respondent.

LITTLETON

LITTLETON: The Commissioner determined a deficiency of $379.03 for the calendar year 1923. Petitioner claims that this deficiency is incorrect in so far as it results from the disallowance by the Commissioner of a loss of $4,701.88 on German marks.

FINDINGS OF FACT.

Petitioner is a resident of Brooklyn, N.Y. On various dates…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murchison Nat'l Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1925
  2. Appeal of BirdUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
  3. Stern v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API