Legal Opinion

Dziuba v. Fletcher

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 12, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We granted certification in this matter to review the Appellate Division judgment holding that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5a does not bar plaintiffs recovery of non-economic damages under the tortfeasor defendant’s automobile insurance policy. Dziuba v. Fletcher, 382 N.J.Super. 73, 82, 887 A.2d 732 (2005), certif. granted, 186 N.J. 363, 895 A.2d 450 (2006). As the Appellate Division decision noted, plaintiff, an uninsured motorist, was not operating his uninsured vehicle when he was injured in an accident involving defendant’s car. Id. at 76, 887 A.2d 732. In such circumstances, we agree with the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dziuba v. FletcherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  2. State v. AcostaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Perrelli v. PastorelleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  2. Aronberg v. TolbertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
  3. STEPHANIE JOSEPHS VS. CHRISTINA M. HEPP (L-3914-16, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API