Amsden v. Danielson
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Assumpsit on a promissory note. Certified from tbe Common Pleas Division on demurrers to replications.
1Opinion of the CourtStiness, J.
The plaintiff, executor of the will of Lucretia C. Danielson, late of Providence, deceased, sues the defendant, a resident of Killingly, Connecticut, upon a promissory note, made by him, dated at said Killingly, and payable to the testatrix. The action was commenced January 12, 1894, by an attachment of real estate of the defendant in the city of Providence in this State. It ap pears by the defendant’s plea that after said will was probated here, and since the commencement of this suit, a copy of the will was recorded in Killingly and William H. Chollar was appointed administrator, who has…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wyman v. HalsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Stevens v. GaylordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
- Pinney v. McGregoryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Merrill v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Hull v. BlakeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wilmington Trust Co. v. De ParisSuperior Court of Delaware · 1915