Sweeney v. New York City Department of Health & Mental Hygiene
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*421This action is barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Plaintiffs fraud claim, based upon the same harm and arising out of the same facts presented •in a prior CPLR article 78 proceeding, could and should have been asserted in the prior proceeding (see generally Parker v Blauvelt Volunteer Fire Co., 93 NY2d 343, 347-348 [1999]; Brooklyn Welding Corp. v City of New York, 198 AD2d 189 [1993], lv dismissed 83 NY2d 795 [1994]). Further, the relief sought in this action (i.e., lost civil servant benefits) could have been claimed and awarded in the article 78 proceeding as “incidental to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Parker v. Blauvelt Volunteer Fire Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Pauk v. Board of TrusteesNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Brooklyn Welding Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bevilacqua v. CRP/Extell Parcel I, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Sweet Constructors, LLC v. Wallkill Medical Development, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Sweet Constructors, LLC v. Wallkill Medical Development, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013