Legal Opinion

State v. Pauling

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 2003No. 71794-0PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

Molotov F. Pauling was convicted of second degree extortion under former RCW 9A.56.130 (1975) for threatening to disseminate and, in actuality, disseminating nude photos of a former girl friend to collect a valid $5,000 small claims court judgment he had against her. The Court of Appeals, stating that the statute lacked a requirement that the threat be wrongful, declared former RCW 9A-.56.130 unconstitutionally overbroad because it prohibited threats that constituted protected speech and reversed Pauling’s conviction. We hold that a limiting construction is available, requiring that the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Terminiello v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. JohnstonWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. JohnstonWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In Re Detention of SkinnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. State v. PaulingWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In re the Detention of SkinnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API