Legal Opinion

Pace v. Assessor of Islip

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 28, 1998PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*90OPINION OF THE COURT

Santucci, J.

The petitioners commenced Small Claims Assessment Review (hereinafter SCAR) proceedings to challenge the real property tax assessments of their respective properties for the tax year 1995-1996. They claimed that the subject properties had been unequally assessed in that their properties were assessed at a higher percentage of full market value than other residential property on the assessment roll.

The Judicial Hearing Officer found, inter alia, that the petitioners failed to prove their claim. The petitioners then commenced the instant proceeding pursuant to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Buck v. KuykendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Environmental Concern, Inc. v. Larchwood Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. National Steamship Co. v. TugmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. DuncanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  2. Interdigital Communications Corp. v. Nokia Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  3. Sofia v. Assessor of EastchesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Krzys v. Town of Clifton ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Yee v. Town of OrangetownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API