Legal Opinion

Larson v. Sinclair Transportation Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 21, 2012No. 09SC966PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

1 In this eminent domain action, we address whether section 88-5-105, C.R.S. (2011), grants condemnation authority to a company for the construction of a petroleum pipeline. We conclude that the General Assembly did not grant, expressly or by clear implication, the power of eminent domain to companies for the construction of pipelines conveying petroleum. Section 88-5-105 therefore does not grant condemnation authority to Sinclair Transportation Company (Sinclair) for the purpose of constructing its pipeline. Accordingly, we reverse the court of appeals' opinion upholding the trial court's…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bly v. StorySupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  2. People v. CrossSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  3. Potashnik v. Public Service Co. of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  4. Boulder County Bd. of Com'rs v. HealthsouthSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  5. Concerned Parents of Pueblo, Inc. v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chittenden v. Colorado Board of Social Work ExaminersColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. People v. RussellColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Sinclair Transportation Co. v. SandbergColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Sinclair Transportation Co. v. SandbergColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Forfar v. WalmartColorado Court of Appeals · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API