Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 24, 2009No. 1D07-4706PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm the defendants convictions, but reverse for resentencing. The trial court erred in sentencing the defendant as a prison releasee reoffender to consecutive terms of imprisonment. Although there were two victims involved, the defendant’s crimes arose from a single criminal episode as they occurred without interruption in time or location. See Staten v. State, 600 So.2d 1269, 1270 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) (holding that even though there were two victims, a single criminal episode occurred because there was not an interruption in time and place); Gloster v. State, 568 So.2d 1318, 1318 (Fla.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Gloster v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Staten v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tarelo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API