Moorman v. Board
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 21 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM BRECKINRIDGE CIRCUIT COURT. CITED General-Statutes, sec. 25, p. 414. Cooley’s Con. Lim. pp. 74, 77, 78. 9 B. Mon. 540, Scarborough v. Watkins & wife. 2 Bush, 215, Willis & wife v. Woodward. 2 Story’s Equity, sec. 1895. 8 Johnson’s Ch. 528, Braddish v. Gibbs. 2 Reynolds’s System of Medicine, p. 148. 7 Bush, 156, Ford v. Teal. 7 Bush, 228, Woodhead, &c. v. Foulds, &c. 3 Bush, 575, Martin v. Davidson’s heirs. 3 Dana, 113, Nantz v. Bailey.
Read the full summary
Case 21 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM BRECKINRIDGE CIRCUIT COURT. CITED General-Statutes, sec. 25, p. 414. Cooley’s Con. Lim. pp. 74, 77, 78. 9 B. Mon. 540, Scarborough v. Watkins & wife. 2 Bush, 215, Willis & wife v. Woodward. 2 Story’s Equity, sec. 1895. 8 Johnson’s Ch. 528, Braddish v. Gibbs. 2 Reynolds’s System of Medicine, p. 148. 7 Bush, 156, Ford v. Teal. 7 Bush, 228, Woodhead, &c. v. Foulds, &c. 3 Bush, 575, Martin v. Davidson’s heirs. 3 Dana, 113, Nantz v. Bailey. CITED 3 Bush, 576, Martin v. Davidson. 1 Peters, 341, Spratt v. Spratt. 6 J. J. Mar. 532, Burnett v. Shackleford. 3 J.-…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE LINDSAY
delivered the opinion oe the court.
On the 6th day of March, 1872, William E. Board and Josephine Board his wife joined in a conveyance- to Daniel Heston, by which they conveyed to him “all the right and interest of the said Josephine in and to all real estate, lands, *137and tenements which descended to her from her father, John Dean.” Pursuant to the purpose and object of the grantors Heston, on the same day, reconveyed the said estate to the husband, William E. Board, subject to a life estate in favor of his said wife, Josephine.
About a year thereafter Mrs. Board died. This action…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Jett v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877
- Paxton v. MarshallUnited States Circuit Court · 1883