Legal Opinion

Rose v. Allison

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1872PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Vigo Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtPettit, C. J.

—This suit was brought by the appellees against the appellant on a promissory note. After issues formed, an affidavit was filed for a change of venue on account of the prejudice of the judge, who thereupon called the judge of the criminal court of that county to preside and try the case.

After the judge thus called had taken his seat on the bench and called the case for trial, the transcript clearly shows that the parties waived a j ury, and consented to try the case before and by the judge thus called and on the bench.

The only question in the case is, had the judge, under this state of facts,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barnes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smurr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Hudson v. AllisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Pattison v. Hogston, Admr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. McNulty v. ConnewIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  5. State v. CrossWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API