Legal Opinion

GRAHAM v. OBERLANDER

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 9, 2020No. 2:20-cv-04321Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHAROD T. GRAHAM, : : Petitioner, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-4321 : v. : : D.B. OBERLANDER and THE : ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE : OF COMMONWEALTH OF : PENNSYLVANIA, : : Respondents. : MEMORANDUM OPINION Smith, J. September 9, 2020 The pro se petitioner has filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and a habeas petition under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

in which he seeks to challenge his state court conviction for first-degree murder, for which he received a life sentence without the possibility of parole. This is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Burton v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Felker v. TurpinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Eric Robinson v. Philip L. Johnson the District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania, Mike FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API