Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Sierra Club v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 22, 2017No. 16-1329 Consolidated with 16-1387Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBrown, Circuit Judge

I join today’s opinion on all issues save the Court’s decision to vacate and remand the pipeline certificates on the issue of downstream greenhouse emissions. Case law is clear:, When an agency “‘has no *1380ability to prevent a certain effect due to’ [its] ‘limited statutory authority over the relevant action[ ],’ then that action ‘cannot be considered a legally relevant cause’ ” of an indirect environmental effect under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). Sierra Club (Freeport) v. FERC, 827 F.3d 36, 47 (D.C. Cir. 2016) (quoting Dep’t of Transp. v. Pub. Citizen, 541 U.S. 752, 770, 124…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Department of Transportation v. Public CitizenSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Wildearth Guardians v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
  4. Sierra Club v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  5. Sierra Club v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API