Legal Opinion

1041 Bushwick Ave. Assoc. v. Soriano

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 21, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Final judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.

Following a prior appeal in this proceeding, which landlord commenced in October 1994 after its successful action to remove the tenant of record from possession, we reversed an order which had dismissed the petition on the ground that the inclusion of occupant’s name on a lease amendment and on one or more section 8 recertification forms (none of which occupant signed) estopped landlord from denying occupant’s tenancy claim (1041 Bushwick Ave. Assoc. v Soriano, 168 Misc 2d 525, 526-527 [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Braschi v. Stahl Associates Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. 390 West End Associates v. WildfoersterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Ramirez v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. 1041 Bushwick Avenue Associates v. SorianoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API