Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Padgett v. Windham

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 25, 1935PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

The judgments remanding the prisoners in these several cases to the custody of the sheriff must be affirmed by the Court on the authority of the general rule' stated in Bell v. Gregory, 89 Fla. 293, 103 Sou. Rep. 832, wherein it was held that in habeas corpus proceedings the Supreme Court will only inquire whether the complaint upon which the defendant is held, or has been convicted,' charges a public offense, and will discharge persons in custody under criminal process only when it finds that to the charge attempted to be preferred, no criminality is attached-by law.

Habeas corpus is not a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex parte PrinceSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
  2. In re RobinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  3. Griswold v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
  4. Lewis v. NelsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  5. Lehman v. SawyerSupreme Court of Florida · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Adams v. CulverSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. State v. SullivanSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  3. State Ex Rel. Williams v. ColemanSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  4. State Ex Rel. Libtz v. ColemanSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  5. Chapman v. Nitrate Agencies Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API