Legal Opinion
State v. Holliday
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 4, 1970PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.
The defendant Arthur Holliday was charged with assaulting Ira Cumby with intent to commit murder in violation of G-eneral Statutes § 53-12. The defendant Albert C. Daniels was charged as an accessory to that crime in violation of §§ 53-12 and 54-196. They were tried jointly before a jury. Holliday was found guilty of 'assault with intent to kill, and Daniels was found guilty of being an accessory to that crime. In each case a motion to set aside the verdict was denied, and, the sole issue on appeal being the same in each case, the court, on stipulation by both defendants, ordered a joint…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- In Re DurantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
- State v. LeopoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Batick v. SeymourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. BoscarinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. LeecanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. MoynahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.