Legal Opinion

Haynes v. DAIRYLAND MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 29, 1972No. 54901PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

We must decide which party should have the burden of producing evidence in a suit brought by a judgment creditor against the insurer of the judgment debtor. The dispute centers around evidence relating to conditions precedent in the policy. The trial court concluded the burden was upon the judgment creditor. We reverse.

Dairyland Mutual Insurance Co. issued a policy of insurance to Edward J. Ruhoff, a resident of Wisconsin, insuring him against liability growing out of the use.of his automobile. The policy contained two conditions which are pertinent. The insured was required…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Henschel v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  2. Tortora v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Haynes v. RuhoffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  4. Barnes v. GallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  5. Verlinden v. GodbersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  2. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co. v. Chandler Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  3. Iowa Comprehensive Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Fund Board v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  4. Layton Manufacturing Co. v. Dulien Steel, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Owen v. MBPXL CORP.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API