I. Janvey & Sons, Inc. v. County of Nassau
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the judgment of Special Term reinstated.
It was petitioner’s burden to establish that the contract had been improperly awarded to Halbro. The petition charged that Halbro’s bid failed to include required spectrophotometer prints and that its products did not meet performance standards. The papers submitted to Special Term established, however, that Halbro submitted prints as required by the bid notice and failed to indicate in what respects its products did not meet the bid specifications.…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Conduit & Foundation Corp. v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Acme Bus Corp. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Baumann & Sons Buses, Inc. v. Patchogue-Medford Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Maross Construction, Inc. v. Central New York Regional Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Conduit & Foundation Corp. v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.