Legal Opinion

National Automobile Insurance v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1942No. L. A. 18078PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHENK, J. —

This is a proceeding to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission. John G. Elston, a worker, was injured while in the employ of Arthur S. Hubbs. The petitioner had issued a policy of workmen’s compensation insurance to “Jesse Hubbs, Arthur S. Hubbs, and Herbert 0. Hubbs, jointly and not severally, a co-partnership.” The Industrial Accident Commission held the petitioner liable on the policy on the theory that the petitioner had waived or was estopped to invoke the clause, “and not severally” because of its conduct in past dealings and because of the knowledge of its…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fedi v. RyanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  2. National Automobile Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Boyd v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  4. Estate of Sarah R. LambertonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Arenbrust, Farahan & LoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. California Compensation & Fire Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Mine v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. National Automobile & Casualty Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. California Compensation & Fire Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API