Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. Fullerton's Administratrix

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 8, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clay

— Affirming.

In this action by I. S. Blankenship against E. E. Fullerton’s administratrix to recover a commission for the sale of certain lots belonging to the decedent, the court at the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence peremptorily instructed the jury to find for the defendant. Judgment was rendered accordingly, and plaintiff has appealed.

A motion to strike the bill of exceptions was passed to the merits. The basis of this motion is that there was no order of court filing the bill or the transcript of evidence. After the motion was made appellant was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Stewart's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  2. Offutt & Oldham v. WintersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. Boone, Foreman Lackey v. WahlCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Asher v. NuckolsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. West v. Nantz' AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  3. Rybolt v. FutrellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  4. Mayo v. Century 21 Action Realtors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API