Legal Opinion

Falterman v. Prestenbach

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 7, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeche, J.

The decree or judgment which has been appealed to this court reads as follows:

“For the above reasons it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that there be judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant as prayed for. All costs to be paid by defendant.”

The demand in suit is for a moneyed judgment. The amount prayed for is of course set forth in plaintiff’s petition, and the question raised by defendant on this appeal is whether the judgment on its face is not invalid for being vague and uncertain.

There are certain elementary rules with regard to the form of judgments which are now…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fontelieu v. FontelieuSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  2. Edenborn v. BlacksherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  3. Russo v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  4. Keane v. FisherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1855
  5. Fuselier v. BabineauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Input/Output Marine Systems, Inc. v. Wilson Greatbatch, Technologies, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Plaisance v. Jefferson Parish School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. State, Department of Children & Family Service ex rel. B.L.J. v. JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API