Legal Opinion

Martin v. Clark.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 26, 1904PublishedCited by 7 opinions

ActioN by S. M. Martin against W. D. Clark, beard by Judge W. B. Allen, at Chambers, December, 1903. From a judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

The commissioners of Montgomery County issued a warrant upon the treasurer for the sum of $600 payable to the plaintiff “on building bridge at Martin’s mill, to be paid out of the special tax funds.” The order was presented to the treasurer, who refused to pay it. Thereupon the plaintiff began this action by issuing a summons returnable before the Judge at chambers. In his complaint and in his reply to the defendant’s answer, the plaintiff alleges that the defendant treasurer has in his hands, subject to said warrant, an amount more than sufficient to pay the same. He asks that a mandamus…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ewbank v. Turner.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Hughes v. Commissioners of Craven CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Bearden v. Fullam.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  4. Bennett v. Commissioners of Swain CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. White v. . Comrs. of JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Tyrrell County v. . HollowaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Southern Audit Co. v. McKensieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. State Ex Rel. Avery County v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Coleman v. . ColemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API