Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Chastain

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 2, 1973No. 27966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Justice.

The first issue to be determined is whether the plaintiffs were entitled to the order granted, and such issue presents the question of whether the plaintiffs need such an order to protect themselves and the partnership.

In Bloodworth v. Bloodworth, 226 Ga. 898, 901 (178 SE2d 198), it was held: "Legal title to real property can never vest in a partnership as such; legal title is in the partners as tenants in common. Baker v. Middlebrooks, 81 Ga. 491, 494 (8 SE 320); Bank of Southwestern Ga. v. McGarrah, 120 Ga. 944, 949 (48 SE 393). Even if a deed to land is made to partners in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Printup Bros. v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  2. Bank of Southwestern Georgia v. McGarrahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Baker v. MiddlebrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  4. Bloodworth v. BloodworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Third World, Ltd. No. II, Inc. v. Brewmasters of Augusta, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. In Re Brookhollow Associates, Debtors. Appeal of Thomas J. DonnelleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  3. In Re Brookhollow AssociatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API