Pridemore's v. Bailey
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
CULLEN, Commissioner.
In an action for a construction of the will of Minnie S. Pridemore, deceased, the court adjudged that under Item 3 of the will the proceeds of six parcels of real estate, which were sold by the testatrix after the date of execution of her will, went to her heirs and did not go to her husband as residuary devisee. The executor and the husband have appealed.
Item 3 of the will is as follows:
“All real estate owned by me which was conveyed to me in my former name, Minnie S. Blackerby, shall be sold by my executor and the proceeds therefrom shall be distributed in accordance…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harvey v. BellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
- Reuling's Extx. v. ReulingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Ruh's Executors v. RuhCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Durham's Admr v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- Miller's Exr. v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown v. SchafferIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
- Norton-Children's Hospitals, Inc. v. First Kentucky Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
- Brock v. HouseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1958
- Estate of Pridmore v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961