Legal Opinion

The People v. Zalapi

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1926No. 17253. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Duncan

Plaintiff in error, Matteo Zalapi, was found guilty by a jury in the county court of Winnebago county on an information containing two counts, charging him with having and possessing, with intent to sell, intoxicating liquor unlawfully, and with unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor, in violation of the Prohibition act. The court entered judgment on the verdict, sentencing him to serve 60 days in the county jail of said county on the first count and to serve ' a sentence under the second count of 120 days in said jail and to pay a fine of $'500 and all costs of prosecution, the sentences to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lippman v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Glennon v. BrittonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. The People v. TateIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Joel v. BennettIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  5. People v. O'BrienIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. The PEOPLE v. SustakIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  2. The People v. HoltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  3. The People v. LavendowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  4. The People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  5. People v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API