Gaskins v. Fowler Gin Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
OxnBr, Justice.
This is an action by a bailor to recover the value of property which the bailee failed to return. The trial judge directed a verdict in favor of the bailor. The question to be determined is whether the circumstances establish liability *203as a matter of law. The material facts are undisputed and are substantially as follows:
Respondent, an illiterate Negro farmer, carried two bales of seed cotton to-appellant’s gin. It was ginned about 3:00 A. M. Respondent saw his two bales of cotton shortly after they came from the press. An employee asked him what he wished to do with the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dalton v. Hamilton Hotel Operating Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Fleischman, Morris & Co. v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Gilland v. Peter's Dry Cleaning Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- Brunson v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Arkwright Mills v. Clearwater Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re CummingsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012