Legal Opinion

Gaskins v. Fowler Gin Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 21, 1950No. 16435PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OxnBr, Justice.

This is an action by a bailor to recover the value of property which the bailee failed to return. The trial judge directed a verdict in favor of the bailor. The question to be determined is whether the circumstances establish liability *203as a matter of law. The material facts are undisputed and are substantially as follows:

Respondent, an illiterate Negro farmer, carried two bales of seed cotton to-appellant’s gin. It was ginned about 3:00 A. M. Respondent saw his two bales of cotton shortly after they came from the press. An employee asked him what he wished to do with the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dalton v. Hamilton Hotel Operating Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Fleischman, Morris & Co. v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  3. Gilland v. Peter's Dry Cleaning Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  4. Brunson v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  5. Arkwright Mills v. Clearwater Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re CummingsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API