Legal Opinion
Village of Los Ranchos De Albuquerque v. Marsh
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 11, 1992No. Nos. 90-2012, 90-2026, 90-2052PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
The appellants have filed a Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing en Banc to reconsider the decision rendered in our unpublished Order and Judgment of October 24, 1991. 947 F.2d 955 (10th Cir. 1991). In that Order, we applied an “arbitrary and capricious” standard to review an agency determination that a proposed project would not have an environmentally significant impact sufficient to require an Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”)1 under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq. Order and Judgment at 4 (citing Marsh v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Sierra Club v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Wyoming Outdoor Coordinating Council v. Earl L. Butz, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- City of Aurora v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Jette v. BerglandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Greenpeace Action v. FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Custer County Action Ass'n v. GarveyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Greenpeace Action v. FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Society Hill Towers Owners' Association v. Edward G. RendellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.