Legal Opinion

Canterino v. the Mirage Casino-Hotel

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 2002No. 30659PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

By the Court,

Young, J.:

On January 29, 2001, we issued an opinion affirming in part and reversing in part a district court order granting a new trial in this personal injury action, and remanding for a new trial on the *192issue of damages only. We subsequently granted respondent’s petition for rehearing, and we now modify our previous opinion and remand for a new trial on the issues of both liability and damages.

The circumstances of this case are fully set forth in Canterino v. The Mirage Casino-Hotel.1 In brief, Joseph Canterino sued the Mirage Casino-Hotel for damages after…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rust v. Clark County School DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Perkins v. KomarnyckyjArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Canterino v. the Mirage Casino-HotelNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Ralston v. StumpOhio Court of Appeals · 1944

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Division of Child & Family Services v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re the Detention of D.F.F.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Kirsch v. TraberNevada Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Canterino v. the Mirage Casino-HotelNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In Re the Detention of D.F.F.Washington Supreme Court · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API