Legal Opinion

Payne v. Cummins

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided October 4, 1922No. 340-3709PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRandolph, J.

This suit was brought by H. C. Cummins, hereinafter styled plaintiff, to recover damages for permanent injury to his land and for loss of crops, against Walker D. Hines, Director General of Bail-roads of the United States, Port Worth & Bio Grande Bailway Company and) Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Compand, hereinafter styled defendants. John Barton Payne, having succeeded Walker D. Hines as Director General of Railways, was substituted for him as defendant prior to the trial of the case. On the trial of the case in the district court the jury were instructed to bring in a verdict for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Hines v. DahnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  3. Rutherford v. Union Pac. R.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1919
  4. Shumard v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  5. O'Neal v. BushTexas Supreme Court · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. PrestonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Kilgore v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API