Legal Opinion · Dissent

Human Development of Erie, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1991No. 1735 C.D. 1989, and 1800 C.D. 1989Published

1DissentSmith, Judge

I dissent from what I perceive to be the Majority’s avoidance of federal law and federal causes of action and the establishment of a policy to disfavor, discourage and/or restrain litigants from pursuing Section 1983 claims in state court proceedings, and concomitantly, the denial of litigants’ rights to recover attorney’s fees which may be awardable by courts to a “prevailing party” in any action or proceeding to enforce Section 1983 claims.

I

The central issue presented to this Court is whether the trial court may award reasonable attorney’s fees and costs to a prevailing party in proceedings…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API