Human Development of Erie, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentSmith, Judge
I dissent from what I perceive to be the Majority’s avoidance of federal law and federal causes of action and the establishment of a policy to disfavor, discourage and/or restrain litigants from pursuing Section 1983 claims in state court proceedings, and concomitantly, the denial of litigants’ rights to recover attorney’s fees which may be awardable by courts to a “prevailing party” in any action or proceeding to enforce Section 1983 claims.
I
The central issue presented to this Court is whether the trial court may award reasonable attorney’s fees and costs to a prevailing party in proceedings…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.