State v. George
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
Prior to the preliminary hearings, counsel for the defendants filed motions to dismiss the complaints upon the grounds of duplicity, multiplicity, vagueness and indefiniteness. The trial court dismissed all but count five of the George complaint and all but counts two, five and ten of the Tollefson complaint.
The statute under which George and Tollefson were charged is as follows:
“945.03 Commercial gambling. Whoever intentionally does any of the following is engaged in commercial gambling and may be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than one year or both:
“(2) For gain,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- In Re SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Holesome v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Anderson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- McPhillips v. BlomgrenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State v. RabeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. SorensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- Harrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- Manson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. LomagroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.