Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania Steel Foundry and MacHine Company v. Secretary of Labor, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 20, 1987No. 86-3546PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
The principal issue before us is whether the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC or the Commission) erred in failing to suppress evidence from an inspection authorized by an ex parte warrant. The contested evidence was the basis of the agency’s decision that Pennsylvania Steel Foundry (Penn Steel) committed numerous violations of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (the Act), 29 U.S.C. § 651 et seq. (1982). An additional issue is whether the Commission improperly enforced a settlement agreement from which Penn Steel contends…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- City of Seattle v. McCreadyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- United States v. Byron Lester ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- City of Seattle v. McCreadyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Seattle v. McCreadyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- William F. Curry v. Beatrice Pocahontas Coal Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.