Legal Opinion

Corcoran v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 29, 1989PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ethel B. Danzig, J.), entered on or about November 15, 1988, which granted plaintiff’s motion for an order directing Ivan Kline, an attorney, to testify without interposing the attorney’s work product privilege and for Lord Day & Lord, Barrett Smith to produce certain documents but exempted from discovery any evaluation of the case, trial strategy and the like, is unanimously reversed on the law and the motion denied, without costs or disbursements.

This appeal was brought by nonparty witness, Ivan Kline, Esq., and the law firm of Lord Day & Lord,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Grolier Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Kandel v. TocherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  4. Beasock v. Dioguardi Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Lane Bryant, Inc. v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stroh v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Fraylich v. Maimonides HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. McCarthy v. KleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Feig v. Lenox Hill HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Casa De Meadows Inc. (Cayman Islands) v. ZamanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API