Flowers v. State

As I read the record after the trial resumed before the jury the defendant did *617not object to Mr. Torbert’s (special prosecutor) question, “What did he say?” Nor did he move to exclude the answer. The trial judge made no ruling. Therefore there is no reservation of a question of law for us to review.

In McConnell v. State, 43 Ala.App. 146, 182 So.2d 577, we find:

“There was considerable testimony as to defendant’s past records of arrest on state and city vagrancy charges. This was improper evidence, Lyons v. State, 32 Ala.App. 44, 21 So.2d 339; Pike v. State, 36 Ala.App. 713, 63 So.2d 606, but…