Southern Ice & Utilities Co. v. Stewart
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
(after stating the facts as above).
Appellant urges on appeal the two points that the findings of fact as made by the trial court were not only clearly contrary to the preponderance of the evidence, but that the evidence was legally insufficient to show actionable negligence. It was admittedly proven that the appellee delivered to appellant a large number of cases of eggs in April, 1926, for preservation by means of cold storage until January following, subject to be sooner withdrawn at the option of appellee. At the time of delivery to appellant the eggs were fresh eggs, sorted, graded, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holt Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Arthur Jordan Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1900
- Patterson v. Wenatchee Canning Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Leidy v. Quaker City Cold Storage & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Smith v. Diamond Ice & Storage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Hunter v. Baltimore Packing & Cold Storage Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brace v. Salem Cold Storage, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
- F-M Potatoes, Inc. v. SudaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Belle Springs Creamery Co. v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- City of Dallas v. MilumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- City of Dallas v. MilumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947