Legal Opinion

Farr v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided July 27, 2004No. 14-03-00502-CRPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice.

Appellant Henry Daniel Farr was convicted of indecency with a child (trial cause number 919035) and two counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child (trial cause numbers 941488 and 918716). Appellant challenges only his convictions for aggravated sexual assault of. a child, arguing the trial court erred in failing to require the State to elect which acts it relied upon to convict him. We reverse these two convictions and remand for a new trial.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

The complainant in this case is K.R., who was thirteen years old at the time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Gutierrez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  3. Wilson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Dixon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  3. Fleck v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  4. Amos W. Jackson, Sr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  5. Amos W. Jackson, Sr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API