Legal Opinion

Demopolis Telephone Co. v. Hood

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 23, 1924No. 2 Div. 834PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The action is to recover damages for personal injuries. The complaint shows that defendant's telephone wire was strung across and over a railroad track, and that plaintiff, in course of his employment, had occasion to pass under the wire, and, in so passing, while standing erect upon the top of a freight car, he came in contact with the wire, and was injured.

It is averred that the wire was so low as not to clear a man of plaintiff's height, standing erect on the top of a car of the size on which he was riding.

After setting out these conditions, it is charged in general terms that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Charleston General Hospital & Training SchoolWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Alabama City G. & A. Ry. Co. v. AppletonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Steagall v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. Pennsylvania Fire Ins. v. DraperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. American Ry. Express Co. v. ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Mobile City Lines, Inc. v. ProctorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  3. Blakeney v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Call v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Coleman v. Hamilton Storage Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API